Skip to main content

Table 2 Factor analysis: rotated matrix of factor loadings (n = 666)

From: Development and validation of an instrument assessing women’s satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program

Item number Item description Factors
   1 2 3 4
15 Staff’s explanations concerning the screening process 0.15 0.04 0.63 0.14
27 Information concerning the possibility of having additional exams 0.06 0.10 0.86 -0.16
34 Information concerning the follow-up in the screening program -0.09 -0.04 0.77 0.24
12 Information concerning the advantages and disadvantages to participate in the PQDCS 0.09 -0.01 0.08 0.65
16 Clarity of the PQDCS informed consent form 0.04 0.05 0.21 0.65
5 Clarity of the information given in the PQDCS documents -0.01 0.13 -0.10 0.83
14 Technician’s respectful attitude 0.89 -0.09 -0.04 0.09
20 Technician’s explanation 0.77 -0.01 0.06 0.03
26 Technician’s professionalism 0.94 0.03 0.04 -0.09
32 Technician’s technical competence 0.83 0.13 0.00 0.03
10 Cleanliness of the radiologic facilities 0.17 0.54 -0.02 0.21
23 Privacy allowed by the installation 0.11 0.76 0.01 0.03
29 Comfort of the changing room -0.09 0.87 0.05 -0.05
4 Comfort of the waiting room -0.03 0.62 0.06 0.16
Proportion of the common variance 74% 15% 6% 5%
Eigenvalues 30.0 6.0 2.7 2.0
  1. Numbers in bold indicate standardized regression coefficients > 0.5.