Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Estimating recruitment rates for routine use of patient reported outcome measures and the impact on provider comparisons

Original Submission
12 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
1 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Himmel
21 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miranda Wolpert
30 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
17 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Himmel
19 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 10
19 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 10
15 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Himmel
5 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nick Black
Resubmission - Version 11
5 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
5 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-66

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page