Variables | IF in Tokyo | PNH in Tokyo | NRW | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Mean | (Standard deviation) | Mean | (Standard deviation) | Mean | (Standard deviation) |
Dependent variables | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Overall bed-densitya | 34.82 | (41.53) | 7.48 | (6.15) | 47.46 | (6.72) |
Explanatory variables | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Costs/cost relevant | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Average facility size (beds) | 92.08 | (18.28) | 61.41 | (20.27) | 77.3 | (14.74) |
LTA land price for T (Â¥1000 s)/LTA rent-level for N | 382.54 | ( 249.39) | 336.49 | (254.12) | 3.11 | (1.02) |
LTA wage of elderly care nurse for T (Â¥1000 s)/LTA duration for care nurse search for Nb (days) | 205.05 | (8.92) | 205.05 | (8.92) | 54.3 | (15.08) |
Need | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
LTA percent elderlyc needing LTC | 13.04 | (1.97) | 15.48 | (1.96) | 15.7 | (2.07) |
LTA growth rate of elderlyc needing LTC | - | - | 8.65 | (2.52) | - | - |
Profit/political intervention (control variables) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
LTA bed-densitya of IF | - | - | 24.14 | (19.98) | - | - |
Densitya of subsidized beds | 5.71 | (6.77) | - | - | - | - |
Demand (control variables) | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
LTA percent elderlyc | 14.09 | (3.86) | 18.12 | (4.46) | 15.9 | (1.59) |
LTA growth rate of elderlyc | 4.61 | (1.83) | 4.15 | (1.95) | 1.31 | (0.67) |
LTA residential tax for T (¥1000 s)/LTA disposable income for N (€1000 s) | 107.38 | (53.60) | 107.16 | (60.78) | 14 | (1.51) |
N | 54-56 | Â | 47-56 | Â | 54 | Â |