Skip to main content

Table 2 Uncertainty parameters used in sensitivity analysis

From: Applying a private sector capitation model to the management of type 2 diabetes in the South African public sector: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Data source

Parameter

Mean value

Lower and upper uncertainty values (Ersatzoutput)

APCSC study [28]

Hazard ratio of fatal CHD in males

2.03%

-0.11%

4.41%

Hazard ratio of fatal CHD in females

2.54%

-0.85%

6.42%

Hazard ratio of fatal stroke in males

2.00%

-1.90%

5.13%

Hazard ratio of fatal stroke in females

2.04%

-0.71%

5.04%

Intervention model (UKPDS risk engine output)

Absolute risk of fatal CHD in males

6.06%

3.92%

8.50%

Absolute risk of fatal CHD in females

3.28%

2.21%

4.27%

Absolute risk of fatal stroke in males

0.83%

0.76%

0.92%

Absolute risk of fatal stroke in females

0.62%

0.54%

0.71%

Comparator model (UKPDS risk engine output)

Absolute risk of fatal CHD in males

8.74%

5.57%

11.66%

Absolute risk of fatal CHD in females

4.78%

3.02%

6.41%

Absolute risk of fatal stroke in males

1.13%

0.94%

1.29%

Absolute risk of fatal stroke in females

0.82%

0.73%

0.94%

Intervention model (costing)

Per capita cost

ZAR 5950

ZAR 5401

ZAR 6533

Comparator model (costing)

Per capita cost

ZAR 4946

ZAR 4467

ZAR 5392