Peer Review reports
From: Assessing the validity of prospective hazard analysis methods: a comparison of two techniques
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann |
| 13 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin |
| 6 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Henry Potts |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin |
| 9 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann |
| 6 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Henry Potts |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin |
| 11 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Jan 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Jan 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.