Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: Assessing the validity of prospective hazard analysis methods: a comparison of two techniques

Original Submission
3 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
28 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann
13 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
6 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Henry Potts
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
9 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann
6 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Henry Potts
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
11 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-41

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page