The association between managed care enrollments and potentially preventable hospitalization among adult Medicaid recipients in Florida

Park, Jungwon; Lee, Keon-Hyung

doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-247

Table 2 Estimation results of logistic regression models

From: The association between managed care enrollments and potentially preventable hospitalization among adult Medicaid recipients in Florida

Dependent variable: Hospitalization for ACSC
	Unadjusted model				Adjusted models¹
					Model (1)				Model (2)
	OR³		95% CI⁴		OR³		95% CI⁴		OR³		95% CI⁴
			Lower	Upper			Lower	Upper			Lower	Upper
Patient characteristics
Medicaid managed care	1.86	*******	1.82	1.90	1.30	*******	1.21	1.40	3.56	*******	2.36	5.37
Male	2.68	*******	2.62	2.74	1.06	**	1.02	1.11	1.06	**	1.02	1.11
Black	1.24	*******	1.21	1.27	1.16	*******	1.07	1.26	1.25	*******	1.15	1.36
White	0.98		0.96	1.00	0.80	*******	0.70	0.91	0.88	+	0.77	1.01
Age, 25-40 years²	3.31	*******	3.15	3.48	2.70	*******	2.39	3.04	2.70	*******	2.39	3.04
Age, 41-64 years²	22.92	*******	21.87	24.02	11.48	*******	10.22	12.91	11.43	*******	10.17	12.85
No. of Comorbidities	1.27	*******	1.27	1.27	1.16	*******	1.15	1.17	1.16	*******	1.15	1.17
County characteristics
Rural	1.06	+	0.99	1.13	1.11		0.89	1.39	1.16		0.92	1.45
MMC penetration	0.998	*******	0.998	0.999	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00
No. of Medicaid HMO	1.02	*******	1.01	1.02	0.99		0.97	1.01	1.00		0.98	1.03
HHI of MMC	0.85	*******	0.82	0.89	0.81	+	0.64	1.01	0.92		0.70	1.19
Primary Care	1.00		0.97	1.03	0.85	*******	0.78	0.93	0.88	**	0.81	0.96
Hospital Beds	1.06	*******	1.03	1.09	1.00		0.91	1.10	1.00		0.89	1.13
CHC	1.01		0.96	1.07	1.01		0.84	1.22	1.01		0.82	1.24
Household Income	0.999	*******	0.999	0.999	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00
Poverty	1.02	*******	1.01	1.02	1.02		0.99	1.05	1.02	+	1.00	1.05
Unemployment rate	0.95	*******	0.94	0.96	0.98		0.94	1.02	0.99		0.95	1.03
Medicaid Admissions	0.999	**	0.999	0.999	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00
Interaction w/ MMC
× Black									0.78	*******	0.69	0.88
× White									0.71	*******	0.65	0.77
× Rural									0.53	*	0.29	0.97
× MMC penetration									1.00		0.99	1.00
× No. of Medicaid HMO									0.96	*******	0.93	0.98
× HHI of MMC									0.49	*******	0.34	0.71
× Primary Care									0.91		0.79	1.06
× Hospital Beds									0.98		0.81	1.19
× CHC									1.04		0.77	1.40

N = 254,321; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
¹Multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for the other factors shown in the table. The standard error is clustered at the county level.
²18-24 age group was used as the base level.
³+ p < .10, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001.
⁴The level of significance of 0.05 (5%) is chosen.

Back to article page

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Health Services Research

Contact us