Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Translation of evidence-based Assistive Technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities

Original Submission
1 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jurgen Broeren
3 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Jones
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Marie Hughes
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Marie Hughes
13 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Jones
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
4 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Marie Hughes
24 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Jones
Resubmission - Version 7
4 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
23 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
12 Mar 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-124

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\