Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparing responses across the two facilities

From: Patient safety culture in a large teaching hospital in Riyadh: baseline assessment, comparative analysis and opportunities for improvement

 

Large

Small

 
 

N

Mean (SD)

N

Mean (SD)

P-Value*

Frequency of event reporting

1054

3.84 (1.11)

321

3.71 (1.12)

0.067

Overall perceptions of safety

1032

3.42 (0.58)

316

3.56 (0.63)

<0.001

Supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting safety

1043

3.48 (0.64)

323

3.59 (0.62)

0.007

Organizational learning-continuous improvement

1051

3.99 (0.59)

325

4.06 (0.49)

0.275

Teamwork within hospital units

1066

3.91 (0.66)

323

4.07 (0.53)

<0.001

Communication openness

1051

3.23 (0.87)

325

3.43 (0.79)

<0.001

Feedback and communication about errors

1054

3.92 (0.82)

325

3.86 (0.90)

0.298

Non-punitive response to error

1040

2.64 (0.80)

321

2.74 (0.77)

0.046

Staffing

1039

2.86 (0.63)

322

2.84 (0.61)

0.691

Hospital management support for patient safety

1064

3.75 (0.71)

320

3.96 (0.67)

<0.001

Hospital handoffs and transitions

1030

3.43 (0.77)

317

3.52 (0.74)

0.071

Teamwork across hospital units

1038

3.54 (0.69)

320

3.73 (0.67)

<0.001

  

N (%)

 

N (%)

P-Value

Patient safety grade

     

 Poor or failing

 

38 (3.6%)

 

7 (2.1%)

0.001

 Acceptable

 

277 (26.3%)

 

57 (17.4%)

 

 Excellent/Very good

 

740 (70.1%)

 

263 (80.4%)

 

Number of events reported

     

 No event reports

 

505 (46.2%)

 

183 (54.5%)

0.008

 1 to 5 event reports

 

508 (46.5%)

 

140 (41.7%)

 

 >5 events reported

 

80 (7.3%)

 

13 (3.9%)

 
  1. *Bold and italicized font is to refer to statistically significant p-values.