Skip to main content

Table 6 Efficiency results for 2009 and 2010 (output orientation)

From: On evaluating health centers groups in Lisbon and Tagus Valley: efficiency, equity and quality

 

Model I

 

Model II

 

Model III

 

Model IV

Year

2009

2010

2009

2010

2009

2010

2010

θ CRS average

1,3010

1,264

1,383

1,380

1,104

1,076

1,099

max θ CRS

1,722

1,758

2,132

2,149

1,314

1,224

1,343

DMU with max θ CRS

2

2

21

11

11

11

2

Number of efficient DMUs (CRS)

4

6

5

6

8

8

6

DMUs with θ CRS <1,05

4

6

6

7

9

11

12

DMUs with θ CRS >1,6

3

3

6

5

0

0

0

Most common Benchmark

22

22

17

17

17

17

8

θ VRS average

1,154

1,134

1,307

1,292

1,049

1,037

1,084

max θ VRS

1,585

1,590

2,125

2,017

1,306

1,188

1,3367

DMU with max θ VRS

5

5

21

11

11

11

2

Number of efficient DMUs (VRS)

7

8

8

7

11

13

9

DMUs with θ VRS <1,05

10

10

8

9

14

15

12

DMUs with θ VRS >1,6

0

0

4

4

0

0

0

Most common Benchmark

17

13

17

17

17

17

8 e 14

θ Scale average

1,132

1,115

1,062

1,070

1,053

1,037

1,014

max θ Scale

1,432

1,412

1,449

1,607

1,189

1,179

1,094

DMU with max θ Scale

15

1

9

9

1

5

15

Number of scale efficient DMUs

4

6

5

6

8

8

6

DMUs with θ Scale <1,05

9

10

13

12

14

16

21

DMUs with θ Scale >1,6

0

0

0

1

0

0

0