Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
6 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz |
29 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Zed |
31 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Corinne Hohl |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Corinne Hohl |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz |
22 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Zed |
15 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Corinne Hohl |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
4 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz |
3 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Corinne Hohl |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
3 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
6 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Budnitz |
14 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Corinne Hohl |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
14 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
4 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Nov 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-473 |
You can find further information about peer review here.