Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
10 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Javanparast |
19 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stan Bernstein |
2 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Javanparast |
4 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stan Bernstein |
24 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
1 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
17 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
21 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
16 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nahid akbari |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
16 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
19 Jun 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-241 |
You can find further information about peer review here.