Skip to main content

Table 6 Relation between scoring an item “excellent” with the degree of confidence in the NHS expressed as odds ratios (95% confidence interval)

From: British residents’ views about general practice care in France – a telephone survey

Question

Domain

Unadjusted odds ratios

Adjusted odds ratios on age and sex

Adjusted odds ratios on age, sex and number of years of residence in France

  

Value

CI

Value

CI

Value

CI

1*

I

1.41

1.01 1.97

1.43

1.02 2.00

1.43

1.02–2.00

2*

I

1.58

1.15– 2.18

1.61

1.17– 2.23

1.61

1.17–2.23

3

I

1.11

0.82– 1.51

1.13

0.83 – 1.54

1.13

0.83–1.54

4

I

1.23

0.90– 1.66

1.25

0.91– 1.71

1.26

0.92–1.72

5*

I

1.48

1.08– 2.02

1.49

1.09– 2.04

1.50

1.09–2.05

6*

I

1.45

1.03– 2.04

1.48

1.05 – 2.08

1.48

1.05 – 2.09

7

II

1.27

0.93– 1.74

1.28

0.93– 1.75

1.27

0.93–1.75

8

II

1.27

0.93– 1.73

1.28

0.93– 1.75

1.28

0.93–1.75

9

II

1.26

0.93– 1.71

1.28

0.94– 1.74

1.28

0.94 – 1.75

10*

II

1.37

1.00– 1.88

1.39

1.02 – 1.90

1.39

1.02–1.91

11*

II

1.46

1.06– 2.02

1.47

1.06– 2.03

1.47

1.06–2.03

12*

III

1.43

1.04– 1.96

1.43

1.05– 1.96

1.44

1.05– 1.97

13

III

1.35

0.99– 1.85

1.36

1.00– 1.86

1.37

1.01–1.88

14*

III

1.51

1.05– 2.17

1.52

1.06– 2.19

1.53

1.06–2.20

15

III

1.29

0.93– 1.79

1.30

0.93– 1.81

1.31

0.94–1.82

16*

IV

1.39

1.00– 1.93

1.41

1.02– 1.97

1.42

1.02–1.98

17

IV

1.13

0.79– 1.60

1.14

0.80 – 1.62

1.14

0.80–1.62

18

IV

1.30

0.91 – 1.86

1.29

0.90– 1.86

1.29

0.90–1.85

19

IV

1.30

0.95 – 1.77

1.33

0.98– 1.8

1.33

0.98–1.82

20

IV

1.1

0.80– 1.51

1.10

0.80– 1.51

1.10

0.80–1.51

21

IV

1.39

0.96– 2.00

1.38

0.95– 1.99

1.38

0.95–1.99

22*

IV

1.53

1.03– 2.26

1.59

1.07– 2.36

1.60

1.08–2.38

23*

IV

1.53

1.08– 2.15

1.51

1.07– 2.13

1.52

1.07–2.14

  1. I : domain “doctor-patient relationship”; II: domain “information and support”; III: domain “medical-technical care”; IV: domain “organization of services”.
  2. * items scored significantly more frequently “excellent” by respondents who were not confident in the NHS (not at all / not very).