Strategy’s effectiveness (N=3498) * | |||
---|---|---|---|
Variable | OR | 95% CI | P |
Intervention | 0.841 | 0.735 - 0.963 | 0.01 |
Age | 1.004 | 0.998 - 1.010 | 0.18 |
Sex | 0.921 | 0.803 - 1.057 | 0.24 |
General Medicine Unit | 0.604 | 0.500 - 0.730 | <0.001 |
Geriatrics Unit | 0.739 | 0.592 - 0.924 | 0.008 |
Charlson | 1.079 | 1.009 - 1.155 | 0.02 |
Follow-up (N=248) at 1 year * | |||
Variable | OR | 95% CI | P |
Intervention | 0.818 | 0.476 - 1.405 | 0.47 |
Age | 0.998 | 0.976 - 1.020 | 0.83 |
Sex | 0.877 | 0.514 - 1.494 | 0.63 |
General Medicine Unit | 0.440 | 0.162 - 1.195 | 0.11 |
Geriatrics Unit | 0.575 | 0.183 - 1.808 | 0.34 |
Charlson | 1.324 | 0.997 - 1.759 | 0.05 |
Overall LOS ( N=3498 ) † | |||
Variable | IRR | 95% CI | P |
Intervention | 0.829 | 0.718 - 0.958 | 0.01 |
Age | 0.982 | 0.963 - 1.001 | 0.07 |
Sex | 0.939 | 0.758 - 1.163 | 0.57 |
General Medicine Unit | 0.221 | 0.174 - 0.282 | <0.001 |
Geriatrics Unit | 0.293 | 0.224 - 0.383 | < 0.001 |
Charlson | 1.020 | 0.958 - 1.087 | 0.53 |
Reason: “ Without any apparent reason ” ( N=1682 ) * ‡ | |||
Variable | OR | 95% CI | P |
Intervention | 0.672 | 0.539 - 0.837 | 0.001 |
Age | 1.017 | 1.006 - 1.028 | 0.003 |
Sex | 0.804 | 0.644 - 1.005 | 0.06 |
General Medicine Unit | 0.253 | 0.188 - 0.341 | <0.001 |
Geriatrics Unit | 0.134 | 0.094 - 0.193 | <0.001 |
Charlson | 1.059 | 0.950 - 1.181 | 0.30 |