Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Risk adjustment for cesarean delivery rates: how many variables do we need? An observational study using administrative databases

Original Submission
13 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Stivanello
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mario Merialdi
14 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene Declercq
16 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aaron Caughey
18 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Stivanello
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Stivanello
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jorma Paavonen
3 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Stivanello
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-13

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page