Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanneke Tummers |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
14 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robbert Huijsman |
14 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jong-Deuk Baek |
31 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanneke Tummers |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
2 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanneke Tummers |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
2 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
2 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanneke Tummers |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
2 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
2 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanneke Tummers |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
2 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
17 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robbert Huijsman |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
Publishing | ||
27 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-127 |
You can find further information about peer review here.