Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ketkesone Phrasisombath |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anh Ngo |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
23 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ketkesone Phrasisombath |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anh Ngo |
22 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - ketkesone Phrasisombath |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
19 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anh Ngo |
23 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - ketkesone Phrasisombath |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
14 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-37 |
You can find further information about peer review here.