Peer Review reports
From: Chances and risks of publication of quality data – the perspectives of Swiss physicians and nurses
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Regula Heller |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Constance Fung |
| 31 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dennis Scanlon |
| 3 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Regula Heller |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Constance Fung |
| 10 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dennis Scanlon |
| 12 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Regula Heller |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Regula Heller |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-368 |
You can find further information about peer review here.