Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Paul Burgess |
| 31 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Persell |
| 21 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anthony Viera |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Persell |
| 4 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Paul Burgess |
| 7 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anthony Viera |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Paul Burgess |
| 31 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Anthony Viera |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Holmes-Rovner |
| 18 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anthony Viera |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 18 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 20 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anthony Viera |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 20 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-20 |
You can find further information about peer review here.