Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wilco Graafmans |
27 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Slappendel |
30 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teryl Nuckols |
7 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingrid Christiaans-Dingelhoff |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teryl Nuckols |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
22 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingrid Christiaans-Dingelhoff |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
6 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingrid Christiaans-Dingelhoff |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-49 |
You can find further information about peer review here.