Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - P Camp |
2 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Enright |
23 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund |
16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Colin Cooke |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - P Camp |
11 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Enright |
27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Colin Cooke |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Colin Cooke |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Colin Cooke |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
16 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-37 |
You can find further information about peer review here.