Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kwasi Torpey |
14 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sam Phiri |
21 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erik J Schouten |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
21 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joep van Oosterhout |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kwasi Torpey |
28 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Erik J Schouten |
8 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sam Phiri |
13 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joep van Oosterhout |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joep van Oosterhout |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
21 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-345 |
You can find further information about peer review here.