Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Persell |
29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt |
28 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stacey Sheridan |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Persell |
7 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt |
18 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stacey Sheridan |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stacey Sheridan |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stacey Sheridan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-331 |
You can find further information about peer review here.