Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of changes within and between the groups.

From: Effect of an institutional development plan for user participation on professionals' knowledge, practice, and attitudes. A controlled study

 

WITHIN

BETWEEN

 

Intervention

N = 1821

Control

N = 2561

Intervention vs. Control

Variable

AdjOR (95% CI)

p-value

AdjOR (95% CI)

p-value

Ratio OR (95% CI)

p-value

Knowledge

      

8b. # Does your unit solicit input from user organisation for the planning of mental health services? (% yes)

1.3(0.7-2.4)

0.390

1.9(1.1-3.2)**

0.014

0.7(0.3-1.5)

0.334

11. Are users invited to participate in staff training meetings at your unit? (% yes)

11.6 (2.6-52.3)**

0.001

2.7(1.1-6.4)**

0.030

4.4(0.8-25.0)*

0.098

12. Has your unit ever asked users to act as teachers at staff training events? (% yes)

3.0(1.0-8.8)**

0.046

1.6(0.9-3.0)

0.116

1.8(0.5-6.3)

0.340

21. # Does the unit have a users' committee? (% yes)

1.6(0.9-3.1)

0.130

1.0(0.6-1.6)

0.949

1.7(0.7-3.8)

0.220

22. # Does the unit have representatives or spokespersons on behalf of the users? (% yes)

1.7(0.8-3.3)

0.142

1.2(0.7-2.0)

0.531

1.4(0.6-3.4)

0.418

Practice

      

3. Are users told they have a right to see and/or correct their records? (% yes)

1.8(0.9-3.4)*

0.072

1.1(0.7-1.9)

0.627

1.6(0.7-3.6)

0.270

7. Do you tell users what goals are intended to be accomplished by the treatment? (% yes)

2.2(0.9-5.4)*

0.094

2.2(0.7-6.6)

0.176

1.0(0.2-4.2)

0.995

26. # In your opinion, are next of kin in general sufficiently involved? (% yes)

0.8(0.4-1.7)

0.640

1.5(0.8-2.6)

0.172

0.6(0.2-1.4)

0.221

Attitudes

      

6. In most cases, where does the responsibility for deciding the goals of treatment usually lie? (% entirely/mostly the user)

1.8(0.6-5.1)

0.281

0.5(0.2-1.3)

0.152

3.3(0.9-13.0)*

0.082

14. Should users be involved in the evaluation of their presenting problems? (% always/usually)

3.0(0.9-10.2)*

0.073

1.8(0.7-4.8)

0.233

1.7(0.4-7.9)

0.514

23. # How would you describe the unit's general attitude towards user participation? (% very/quite good)

1.6(0.9-3.1)

0.121

1.2(0.7-2.0)

0.605

1.4(0.6-3.3)

0.393

18. In your opinion, what are the most important reasons when users of mental health care don't want to be involved?

      

- Lacking in self-confidence (% yes)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)**

0.026

0.6 (0.4-1.1)*

0.085

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.550

- Lacking in motivation (% yes)

0.7 (0.3-1.1)

0.123

1.0 (0.6-1.7)

0.977

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

0.315

- Lack of trust in the ability of the services to provide help (% yes)

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

0.169

0.9 (0.5-1.6)

0.761

0.7 (0.3-1.7)

0.416

- Other reasons (% yes)

0.4 (0.2-1.1)

0.076

0.9 (0.5-1.8)

0.793

0.5 (0.1-1.5)

0.188

20. In your opinion, how would the service develop if users were involved in planning and/or carrying out the mental health service?:

      

- More chance that users would benefit from those services the first time round (% yes)

0.6 (0.3-1.3)

0.178

0.8 (0.4-1.4)

0.388

0.7 (0.3-2.0)

0.562

- Downgrading of services and delivery (% yes)

4.8 (0.5-45.9)

0.173

1.0 (0.3-3.2)

0.978

4.9 (0.4-61.9)

0.221

  1. The table only shows variables with p ≤ 0.2. For the within-group analysis, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AdjOR) > 1.0 favours increase from baseline to follow-up. For the between-group analysis, Ratio Odds Ratio (ROR) > 1.0 favours intervention.
  2. 1 N is the no of participants who returned completed questionnaires. The N in the four samples varied for each question due to missing answers on the variables (0%-8.2%).
  3. * p-value < 0.1
  4. ** p-value < 0.05
  5. # Questions marked # were added to the Consumer Participation Questionnaire (CPQ) in this study.
  6. p-value calculated using logistic regression and test of proportions.