Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching Wen Chien |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Kuti |
28 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ata Nevzat Yalcin |
30 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching Wen Chien |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching Wen Chien |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
31 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching Wen Chien |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
31 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Kuti |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
27 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ching Wen Chien |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
31 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
31 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-289 |
You can find further information about peer review here.