Skip to main content

Table 2 Multiple logistics regression model for (i) perceived change of health seeking behaviours, and (ii) use of voucher

From: Can vouchers make a difference to the use of private primary care services by older people? Experience from the healthcare reform programme in Hong Kong

 

(i) Perceived change

Whether change of health seeking behaviours

(ii) Use of voucher

Whether ever used the vouchers

Variable

Adjusted odds ratio

(95% CI)

P value

Adjusted odds ratio

(95%CI)

P value

Marital status

    

   Single

1.22 (0.54 - 2.78)

0.397

-

 

   Married

1.30 (0.89 - 1.90)

 

-

 

   Divorced/Separated Widowed

1

 

-

 

Education level

    

   No education

1.70 (0.77 - 3.75)

0.051

1.86 (0.97 - 3.56)

0.020

   Primary

2.46 (1.15 - 5.25)

 

1.13 (0.56 - 2.13)

 

   Secondary

2.21 (1.02 - 4.81)

 

1.13 (0.59 - 2.20)

 

   Tertiary or above

1

 

1

 

Self-rated health compared with last year

   Better

2.11 (1.28 - 3.48)

0.003

0.54 (0.32 - 0.92)

0.046

   Similar

0.94 (0.64 - 1.34)

 

0.77 (0.56 - 1.05)

 

   Worse

1

 

1

 

Usually go to see which types of doctors before launch of voucher scheme

   Public doctor only

1

0.024

1

< 0.001

   Private doctor only

1.03 (0.65 - 1.65)

 

3.11 (2.09 - 4.64)

 

Both public and private doctor

1.65 (1.15 - 2.34)

 

2.58 (1.84 - 3.61)

 

   Don't know

2.09 (0.54 - 8.01)

 

1.38 (0.26 - 6.94)

 

Medical consultation in the past one month (excluding the current episode for elders recruited in clinics)

   No

1.28 (0.91 - 1.76)

0.156

0.45 (0.34 - 0.60)

< 0.001

   Yes

1

 

1

 

Hospitalization in the past one year

   No

-

 

0.69 (0.48 - 0.99)

0.041

   Yes

-

 

1

 
  1. Adjusted for age, gender and living districts. Only those factors that were significant in the univariate analysis were tested by logistic regression.