Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Fry |
29 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Willson |
9 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Terri Warholak |
29 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pulver |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Willson |
21 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Fry |
1 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Terri Warholak |
23 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pulver |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
25 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lisa Pulver |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
29 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-206 |
You can find further information about peer review here.