Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stella Forti |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pauline Smith |
| 25 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rich tyler |
| 19 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stella Forti |
| 23 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pauline Smith |
| 1 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rich tyler |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 30 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 30 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-162 |
You can find further information about peer review here.