Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rhonda Cady |
23 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Young |
25 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryan Stone |
14 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jay Berry |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bryan Stone |
8 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rhonda Cady |
20 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jay Berry |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jay Berry |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jay Berry |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
28 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jay Berry |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jay Berry |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
23 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
23 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-117 |
You can find further information about peer review here.