Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Concordance and robustness of quality indicator sets for hospitals: an analysis of routine data

Original Submission
18 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
8 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Gilthorpe
11 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd
12 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - john wright
15 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary McLean
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
27 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Gibberd
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
2 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Ghali
Resubmission - Version 6
5 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
Resubmission - Version 7
10 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
15 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jürgen Stausberg
Resubmission - Version 8
15 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
18 May 2011 Editorially accepted
18 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-106

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page