Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clara Moerman |
21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cecile RL Boot |
17 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joke Haafkens |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joke Haafkens |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joke Haafkens |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joke Haafkens |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Joke Haafkens |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
17 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
17 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-104 |
You can find further information about peer review here.