Peer Review reports
From: The failure of routine rapid HIV testing: a case study of improving low sensitivity in the field
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Gray |
25 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Dax |
26 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Wolpaw |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Dax |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
11 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Wolpaw |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
17 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Benjamin Wolpaw |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
22 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-73 |
You can find further information about peer review here.