Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noralou Roos |
24 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anita Ravelli |
30 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
18 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noralou Roos |
12 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anita Ravelli |
2 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noralou Roos |
6 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anita Ravelli |
16 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
16 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paulo Nogueira |
5 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
15 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rosemary Anne Karmel |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
15 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
18 Feb 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Feb 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.