Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Britt Arrelov |
11 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Burton |
29 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Gabbay |
29 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Hoedeman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Burton |
11 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Britt Arrelov |
16 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Hoedeman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rob Hoedeman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
8 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-305 |
You can find further information about peer review here.