Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - eileen wllis |
| 17 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pim Kuipers |
| 18 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Rogers |
| 2 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sumit Kane |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sumit Kane |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pim Kuipers |
| 5 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Rogers |
| 6 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sumit Kane |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 6 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Rogers |
| 5 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sumit Kane |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 5 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 5 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sumit Kane |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 5 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-286 |
You can find further information about peer review here.