Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of organizational performance of colorectal cancer care by core measure indicators

From: Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in Taiwan

Hospitals\Performance Indicator-based Case-based
  Adherence1* Hospital score1# Hospital score2# Hospital score3# Adherence2*
  % (95 CI)     % (95 CI)
H01§ 86.5 (79.4-93.7) 5 2 2 83.5 (80.4-86.7)
H02 87.1 (79.3-95.0) 5 5 2 84.2 (82.4-86.0)
H03 82.3 (68.9-95.8) 6 4 2 79.8 (76.7-82.9)
H04 82.4 (70.3-94.6) 5 4 4 79.7 (77.2-82.1)
H05 88.8 (82.2-95.4) 7 3 1 86.1 (82.7-89.5)
H06 85.7 (76.3-95.1) 6 4 4 88.1 (85.3-90.9)
H07 90.2 (83.0-97.4) 8 6 4 85.6 (82.3-89.0)
H08 91.0 (83.2-98.7) 8 6 3 88.9 (87.8-90.1)
H09 85.9 (77.5-94.3) 4 3 1 81.2 (78.5-83.9)
H10 86.1 (78.2-94.0) 6 4 4 84.7 (82.6-86.9)
H11 79.8 (67.7-91.9) 2 0 0 79.4 (77.5-81.3)
H12 84.7 (75.0-94.5) 4 1 1 82.2 (79.7-85.3)
H13 88.9 (82.1-95.7) 6 4 2 84.1 (80.4-87.7)
H14 85.3 (76.3-94.2) 6 6 3 85.4 (82.6-88.1)
H15 82.4 (74.1-90.7) 3 0 0 80.7 (78.4-83.1)
H16 81.8 (71.3-92.4) 4 4 2 77.6 (73.0-82.1)
H17 85.0 (73.8-96.1) 6 3 2 78.7 (75.1-82.3)
H18 86.6 (76.9-96.3) 5 4 3 81.6 (79.6-83.7)
Mean 85.8 (78.3-93.3) 5.3 3.5 2.2 82.8  
  1. *: Adherence1(Indicator-based adherence); Adherence2 (case-based adherence); 95 CI (95% confidence interval) listed in the parenthesis
  2. #: Hospital score are composite score for indicator-based level, defined as following: one point was awarded if adherence >50th percentile (Hospital score1) or >75th percentile (Hospital score2) or > 90th percentile (Hospital score3) for each indicator, and then sum up.
  3. §: H01 to H18 denote the corresponding hospital (H). We report the results by designation to maintain the confidentiality of the hospitals and providers who participated in TCDB.