Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of organizational performance of colorectal cancer care by core measure indicators

From: Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in Taiwan

Hospitals\Performance

Indicator-based

Case-based

 

Adherence1*

Hospital score1#

Hospital score2#

Hospital score3#

Adherence2*

 

%

(95 CI)

   

%

(95 CI)

H01§

86.5

(79.4-93.7)

5

2

2

83.5

(80.4-86.7)

H02

87.1

(79.3-95.0)

5

5

2

84.2

(82.4-86.0)

H03

82.3

(68.9-95.8)

6

4

2

79.8

(76.7-82.9)

H04

82.4

(70.3-94.6)

5

4

4

79.7

(77.2-82.1)

H05

88.8

(82.2-95.4)

7

3

1

86.1

(82.7-89.5)

H06

85.7

(76.3-95.1)

6

4

4

88.1

(85.3-90.9)

H07

90.2

(83.0-97.4)

8

6

4

85.6

(82.3-89.0)

H08

91.0

(83.2-98.7)

8

6

3

88.9

(87.8-90.1)

H09

85.9

(77.5-94.3)

4

3

1

81.2

(78.5-83.9)

H10

86.1

(78.2-94.0)

6

4

4

84.7

(82.6-86.9)

H11

79.8

(67.7-91.9)

2

0

0

79.4

(77.5-81.3)

H12

84.7

(75.0-94.5)

4

1

1

82.2

(79.7-85.3)

H13

88.9

(82.1-95.7)

6

4

2

84.1

(80.4-87.7)

H14

85.3

(76.3-94.2)

6

6

3

85.4

(82.6-88.1)

H15

82.4

(74.1-90.7)

3

0

0

80.7

(78.4-83.1)

H16

81.8

(71.3-92.4)

4

4

2

77.6

(73.0-82.1)

H17

85.0

(73.8-96.1)

6

3

2

78.7

(75.1-82.3)

H18

86.6

(76.9-96.3)

5

4

3

81.6

(79.6-83.7)

Mean

85.8

(78.3-93.3)

5.3

3.5

2.2

82.8

 
  1. *: Adherence1(Indicator-based adherence); Adherence2 (case-based adherence); 95 CI (95% confidence interval) listed in the parenthesis
  2. #: Hospital score are composite score for indicator-based level, defined as following: one point was awarded if adherence >50th percentile (Hospital score1) or >75th percentile (Hospital score2) or > 90th percentile (Hospital score3) for each indicator, and then sum up.
  3. §: H01 to H18 denote the corresponding hospital (H). We report the results by designation to maintain the confidentiality of the hospitals and providers who participated in TCDB.