Skip to main content

Table 3 Interview and sociodemographic characteristics

From: “So at least now I know how to deal with things myself, what I can do if it gets really bad again”—experiences with a long-term cross-sectoral advocacy care and case management for severe multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study

 

Total

n (%)

Caregiver

n (%)

HCS

n (%)

PwsMS

n (%)

Sex

Female

21 (60)

5 (41.6)

8 (80.0)

8 (61.5)

Male

14 (40)

7 (58.3)

2 (20.0)

5 (38.5)

Age

 Mean

54.2

57.3

50.8

53.9

SD

9.5

8.4

6.7

11.7

Interview duration [min]

 Mean

23.9

27.4

24.7

20.1

SD

11.1

12.5

11.7

8.7

Interview location

Online

28 (80.0)

9 (75.0)

9 (90.0)

10 (76.9)

Face-to-face

7 (20.0)

3 (25.0)

1 (10.0)

3 (23.1)

Relationship between participants

Partner

 

9 (75.0)

 

7 (53.8)

Parent

 

3 (25.0)

  

No caregiver included

   

6 (46.2)

Living situationa

Alone

   

5

Partner

 

12

 

7

Child

 

5

 

2

Patient

 

1

  

Children

Yes

 

10 (83.3)

 

7 (53.8)

No

 

2 (16.7)

 

6 (46.2)

Country of origin

Germany

   

11 (84.6)

Poland

   

1 (7.7)

Hungary

   

1 (7.7)

Subgroupb

Subgroup 1

   

4 (30.8)

Subgroup 2a

   

5 (38.5)

Subgroup 2b

   

4 (30.8)

EDSS at the time of inclusion into the COCOS-MS study

Mean

   

6.8

Median

   

7.0

SD

   

0.7

Min

   

6.0

Max

   

8.0

Disease duration in years

Mean

   

13.5

Median

   

14

SD

   

8.1

Min

   

3

Max

   

26

Highest school qualification (german system)

Abitur (higher education entrance qualification (A-levels))

 

3 (25)

 

4 (30.8)

Fachabitur (subject-related entrance qualification)

 

1 (8.3)

 

5 (38.5)

Mittlere Reife (intermediate secondary school-leaving certificate (O-levels))

 

3 (25)

 

2 (15.4)

Hauptschulabschluss (main school qualification)

 

5 (41.7)

 

2 (15.4)

Marital status

Single

 

1 (8.3)

 

3 (23.1)

Married/ partnership

 

10 (83.3)

 

7 (53.8)

Divorced

 

1 (8.3)

 

2 (15.4)

Widowed

   

1 (7.7)

  1. aMultiple answers possible
  2. bFor detailed inclusion criteria see Table 1 in Golla et al. [41]