A policy Analysis of Phenylketonuria Screening National Program in Iran

Background Phenylketonuria (PKU) Screening is a public health measure aimed at identifying the The aim of this study was to analyze the policies of the PKU national screening program in Iran. Methods PKU screening program policies were analyzed according to the policy triangle model. Document review and 38 semi-structured interviews were used for data collection. Document review data were analyzed using content analysis and interview data were analyzed using framework analysis. Results The findings of the study were categorized according to the content (structure and organization, rules, bylaws and guidelines), process (agenda setting, formation, implementation, and evaluation of screening policies and programs), the policy context (political and executive factors, economic and financial factors, social and cultural factors), and the stakeholders(Genetics office, Network Development Bureau, Population and Family Health Bureau, Laboratory, Company, Registry). Conclusions The policy triangle framework helped to explain the different components of the PKU screening program.

brain can be prevented by timely detection and control of phenylalanine levels in the blood (7).
Neonatal screening is a population-based public health screening program implemented for early detection (8). PKU screening is a prerequisite for early implementation of the Phe restricted diet, which is essential to prevent severe neurological disorders in patients with PKU (9). Nowadays, most developed countries carry out PKU screening, and any newborn with PKU is immediately exposed to a Phe-restricted diet to lower plasma Phe concentrations. This combination of early diagnosis and initiation of treatment results in normal IQ for most PKU patients (10).
The PKU screening program in Iran began in 2006, and blood samples were taken from all infants on day 3 to 5 after birth for colorimetric screening. And people with phenylalanine levels of 4 mg/dL or higher were referred to be confirmed by HPLC test. Then regular follow-up is performed for people who have phenylalanine levels equal to or greater than 4 mg/dL, and if the phenylalanine levels are 7 mg/dl or more, the diet begins with restricted phenylalanine. Dietary supplements of Iron, zinc, selenium, carnitine, vitamins and essential fatty acids are prescribed for all children up to 2 years of age (11).
Policy analysis includes plans and actions to achieve health care goals by defining a vision for the future, setting goals and objectives, setting priorities, and identifying the roles of different groups.
Health policy analysis helps to understand the success or failure in implemented policies so that they can be useful for planning future policies. Health policy analysis helps policymakers to improve their successful implementation of future policies and provide opportunities to produce policy documents (12). Policy analysis can help to understand the complexity of the policy process and its nature and provide policy-related evidence (13). Policy analysis helps to understand why policymakers pay attention to certain issues in the health system and disregard other issues, also to identify stakeholders who agree or disagree with the policies and the reasons for or disagree with it, as well as to identify undesirable consequences of policies implementation and future problems in implementing policies and achieving their goals (14)(15). Studying the role of evidence in policymaking helps to better understand the contribution of research to policy formation and to identify the factors that influence it. However, research evidence in policymaking is still less used in the eastern Mediterranean region (16). Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the policies of the national phenylketonuria screening program in Iran.

Study design
This qualitative study was conducted from May 2015 to January 2016 using the Walt and Gilson triangle framework. The model covers four general areas: content, context, actors, and the decisionmaking process. The content includes policy goals, operational policies, and so on. Actors refer to executives and influential organizations. The context refers to social, economic, political, cultural and other environmental conditions. The process consists of four parts: agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation (17).

Study participants included 38 individuals from the Health Commission of the Islamic Consultative
Assembly, Ministry of Health (deputies of health and treatment, food and drug administration, the Iranians Health Insurance organization, the policymaking council, faculty members in universities of medical sciences, children's specialized hospitals, Pasteur Institute),Welfare Organization, and PKU Patients Support Association. Target groups were selected based on purposive sampling. Their selection criteria included knowledge and experience in phenylketonuria screening programs, active participation in phenylketonuria screening programs, and interest in research participation.

Data collection
Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data using the interview guideline. Credibility, transferability, dependability, and conformability were used such as criteria of rigor and trustworthiness of this study. Interviews were conducted face-to-face at a designated time and place.
The interviews lasted between 30 and 65 minutes. At the beginning of each interview, a summary of the research topic and the method of using the data were provided for the participants. The written consent was obtained to conduct the interview. Noting was also used during the recording of the interviews. The audio files were transcribed at the earliest opportunity.

Data analysis
Framework Analysis was used to analyze the data, which included five basic steps: Familiarization, Identifying a Thematic Framework, Indexing, Charting and Mapping and Interpretation.In addition, Document Analysis was used to validate the findings of the interviews and to profit from the evidence available in the policy process. Documents were collected purposefully by referring to the organizations involved in the national phenylketonuria screening program and reviewing internet sites. The content analysis method was used for data analysis of documents. "Iran's sanctions have made us constrained by drug access and low access to technology" (P.17).

Context
"Families pay most of the costs. This is not a disease that to treat it and say to the patient you can go and comeback next year. Intervals between following ups are short and this creates a financial burden for families "(P. 7).
Social and cultural factors affecting program implementation include positive attitudes towards the program and more reference in order to disease prevention, weak parenting skills of parents, poor self-care in adolescents, withdrawal from treatment in adulthood, and lack of internal control, the desire for family marriages in society and social stigma associated with the disease."With age, withdrawal from treatment increases and disease control becomes more difficult. Many patients 6 develop seizures because they have not followed the diet and their blood phenylalanine levels have risen." (P.28). "Disease-related social stigma makes it difficult to care and follow up. The parents of one of the patients changed their home so that they would not be followed up so that they would not be found. A person who has a child with PKU doesn't even tell his sister and brother that his child has PKU" (P.36)

Content
The purpose of phenylketonuria screening national program was to reduce physical disability, mental The problem stream can be attributed to physical and mental disabilities, IQ loss, and the costs of not being diagnosed early (First Stream). "There was a problem. Every year a number of patients were added to PKU patients. They suffer from severe physical and mental disabilities, reduced IQs and complications such as seizures and increased financial burden for the families and health system. On the other hand, the disease was able to be diagnosed early and be cared for.(P.1).
The above problems have led health policymakers to find a solution to these problems. Therefore, with the successful implementation of the hypothyroid screening program and the use of

Formulation of phenylketonuria screening policies
The scientific proposal for the implementation of the screening program was formulated by two faculty members. A services package to patients with hereditary metabolic diseases was developed by faculty members from various universities. Program feasibility was performed by different health groups. The results of the health system evaluation for the implementation of the program showed that from the perspective of some officials, the PKU program was not a priority. Documentary statistics from PKU were not available at the start of the program. There was no complete information system to provide up-to-date information on the disease. There was a lack of HPLC to confirm the tests.

Implementation of PKU screening policies
The approach to implementing PKU screening policies was a top-down approach. The pilot program

Challenges of Implementing a PKU Screening Program
A national screening decision was made in 2011, but was delayed due to laboratory equipment problems in medical universities in 2012. Monitoring and follow-up of PKU patients have lower priority than other programs in some selected hospitals. Selected hospitals suffered from a shortage of milk powder. It was not appropriate to record hospital and non-hospital information. Qualitative evaluation of selected hospitals was not performed well due to inadequate co-operation of some hospital managers and the lack of a supervisory system for providing PKU services in hospitals.
From the year 2007 to 2011, when we wanted to start a national screening program, during these four years, the most problems were laboratory diagnostic problems "(P.3)."One of the problems is that

Discussion
The Phenylketonuria Screening National Program was announced because of pressure from parent persistence and their demand for screening and therapeutic interventions and interest, follow-up, and persuasion by executives to persuade policymakers.
The results of Barojo study in 2007 showed that policymakers' willingness and pressure of families with affected children led to a particular disease being selected for the neonatal screening program in Latin American countries without any appropriate basis or the use of a national standard (18). In the United States, legal pressure from parents and the legislature was the main driving force behind the widespread screening (19). in Canada showed that health care workers for the phenylketonuria screening program were physicians, nutritionists, nurses, social workers, biochemists, genetic counselors, and psychologists (21).Midwives, neonatal unit staff, health visitors and health team members, nursing specialist consultants, pediatric nurses in the pediatric nursing team, child health team, public health staff, general practitioners and pediatricians are involved in the implementation of the UK Neonatal Screening Program (22).The use of nurses and midwives in the care team of patients with phenylketonuria in Canada and the United Kingdom was a distinctive feature of the structure of human resources with Iran.
Based on the results, a "top-down" approach to policy implementation was adopted. This approach is focused on a small group of high-level policymakers and policies are seen as the orders of the authorities that the lower levels need to implement.In this approach, there is no chance for bottom-up negotiation and communication to influence the policy process (23).
The results of the study showed the impact of political changes in the country and consequently Barojo study (33), but it was inconsistent with the results of Campbell and Ross's study in the US in 2003 (34). Parents' ignorance of the disease can be due to their poor health literacy.

Study Limitations
The study also had some limitations. It was difficult to study the participants' cooperation in the study, and few studies were conducted in this field.

Conclusion
The policy triangle framework helped to explain the different components of the PKU screening

Financial support and sponsorship
This study was part of a thesis for a PhD degree in health policy and was funded by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.