Skip to main content

Table 5 PCC Scores according to survey participants and their affiliation (N = 402)

From: Evaluating person-centered care in residential care facilities from the perspective of caregivers in South Korea: a survey

 

Variable

N

Total

  
 

Mean ± SD

 

p-value

Evaluation grade of facilities, n (%)

A (Reference)

17

161.18 ± 6.67

< 0.001

B

122

133.66 ± 10.04***

 

C

82

123.96 ± 5.23***

 

D

8

112.12 ± 0.35***

  
 

No evaluation

173

141.06 ± 12.09***

 

Age group

40’s (Reference)

27

127.56 ± 11.59

0.003

 

50’s

207

135.70 ± 14.26**

 
 

60’s

168

136.79 ± 12.27***

 

Work period group (year)

< 3 (Reference)

54

133.13 ± 13.30

0.258

 

3 to < 5

152

136.10 ± 13.17

 
 

≥ 5

196

135.90 ± 13.70

 

Marital status

Single (Reference)

8

130.00 ± 0.00

0.137

 

Married

344

136.15 ± 13.52

 
 

Divorced / widowed / others

50

132.74 ± 13.59

 

Educational level

< High school (Reference)

104

131.35 ± 9.70

0.001

 

High school

266

136.77 ± 13.06***

 
 

> High school

32

139.72 ± 21.89

 

Economic status

Poor (Reference)

176

129.66 ± 10.31

< 0.001

 

Normal

163

135.37 ± 13.14***

 
 

Enough

63

152.81 ± 4.15***

 
  1. P-value was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test with the posthoc comparison using Bonferroni’s correction
  2. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 compared with reference
  3. The PCC is a total of 192 points, 32 items x 6-point Likert scale per item, from 1 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree