Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariate analysis of factors associated with provider explicit and implicit bias

From: Provider implicit and explicit bias in person-centered maternity care: a cross-sectional study with maternity providers in Northern Ghana

Characteristic

Category

Score on low SES woman vignette, (N = 148)

Score on high SES woman vignette, (N = 148)

IAT score, (N = 150)

Coeff (95% CI)

p-value

Coeff (95% CI)

p-value

Coeff (95% CI)

p-value

Facility type

Govt hospital

  

Reference

-

Reference

-

Govt health center/Dispensary

  

0.90 (-0.41,2.21)

0.180

0.18 (0.04,0.32)

0.013

Mission/private

  

-0.89 (-1.64, -0.15)

0.019

0.18 (0.07,0.29)

0.002

Age

23–29 years

  

Reference

-

  

30–39 years

  

0.10 (-1.40,1.59)

0.900

  

40–52 years

  

2.53 (0.51,4.54)

0.014

  

Marital status

Married

    

Reference

-

Single

    

0.15 (-0.02,0.32)

0.091

Number of children

No children

  

Reference

-

  

1 to 2 children

  

0.92 (-0.49,2.32)

0.200

  

3 or more children

  

2.40 (0.55,4.24)

0.011

  

Educational level

Training college and below

Reference

-

    

University and above

-2.17 (-3.74, -0.60)

0.007

    

Monthly salary

Less than 2000 GHS

    

Reference

-

2000–3000 GHS

    

0.12 (0.01,0.23)

0.041

Years as provider

0–5 years

  

Reference

-

  

6–10 years

  

-0.35 (-2.07,1.38)

0.694

  

More than 10 years

  

-2.87 (-4.87, -0.88)

0.005

  

Social mobility

Upward mobility

Reference

-

  

Reference

-

No change

1.11 (0.04,2.19)

0.043

  

-0.04 (-0.17, 0.08)

0.493

Downward mobility

-0.51 (-1.99,0.97)

0.500

  

-0.24 (-0.43, -0.05)

0.013

Training on interpersonal interactions

No

Reference

-

    

Yes

-0.57 (-1.41,0.28)

0.189

    
  1. Higher mean scores on the low SES vignette indicate stronger negative explicit bias towards the low SES woman, while higher mean scores on the high SES vignette indicate stronger negative explicit bias towards the high SES woman. Higher IAT scores indicate stronger implicit bias in favor of high SES patients