Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate analysis—correlation between provider bias measures and cross tabulations of mean bias scores by provider and facility characteristics

From: Provider implicit and explicit bias in person-centered maternity care: a cross-sectional study with maternity providers in Northern Ghana

Characteristic

Category

Score on low SES woman vignette, (N = 148)

Score on high SES woman vignette, (N = 148)

IAT score (N = 150)

  

Correlations

  

N

r

 

P-value

N

r

 

P-value

N

r

 

P-value

Score on low SES woman vignette

    

146

0.60

 

 < 0.001

148

0.01

 

0.946

Score on high SES woman vignette

146

0.60

 

 < 0.001

    

148

-0.03

 

0.719

IAT score

150

0.01

 

0.946

148

-0.03

 

0.719

    
  

Crosstabulations

  

N

Mean

SD

P-value

N

Mean

SD

P-value

N

Mean

SD

P-value

Total

 

148

18.07

3.60

 

148

16.88

3.15

 

150

0.71

0.43

 

Facility type

Govt hospital

91

17.8

3.37

0.511

91

16.9

2.78

0.287

92

0.64

0.43

0.041

Govt health center

32

18.5

3.92

32

17.4

3.95

32

0.83

0.37

Mission/private

25

18.6

4.03

25

16.1

3.26

26

0.80

0.44

Position

Nurse

129

17.9

3.69

0.146

131

16.8

3.24

0.189

131

0.70

0.43

0.265

Midwife

11

18.1

2.55

10

16.9

1.97

11

0.90

0.35

Ward aid/assistant/support

8

20.5

2.62

7

19.0

2.24

8

0.62

0.44

Gender

Male

4

18

1.15

0.967

4

16.8

2.50

0.935

4

1.05

0.55

0.108

Female

144

18.1

3.65

144

16.9

3.18

146

0.70

0.42

Age

23–29 years

43

18.3

3.24

0.223

43

16.7

2.71

0.066

43

0.67

0.45

0.612

30–39 years

83

17.7

3.73

83

16.6

3.45

84

0.71

0.42

40–52 years

22

19.1

3.68

22

18.3

2.40

23

0.78

0.40

Marital status

Married

109

18.1

3.73

0.801

110

17.0

3.35

0.361

111

0.68

0.44

0.110

Single

39

17.9

3.26

38

16.5

2.50

39

0.80

0.37

Number of children

No children

35

17.9

3.47

0.241

34

16.0

2.53

0.015

35

0.79

0.43

0.318

1 to 2 children

83

17.8

3.67

84

16.8

3.24

84

0.66

0.43

3 or more children

30

19.1

3.51

30

18.2

3.18

31

0.74

0.41

Educational level

Training College and below

126

18.4

3.37

0.004

126

17.1

3.07

0.075

128

0.70

0.44

0.705

University and above

22

16.0

4.27

22

15.8

3.46

22

0.74

0.39

Monthly salary

Less than 2000 GHS

111

18.2

3.57

0.573

111

16.8

3.17

0.742

113

0.70

0.44

0.053

2000–3000 GHS

37

17.8

3.74

37

17.0

3.14

37

0.83

0.38

Years as provider

0–5 years

68

18.4

3.22

0.667

68

16.8

3.03

0.443

69

0.69

0.43

0.232

6–10 years

42

17.7

3.28

43

17.3

2.79

43

0.65

0.43

More than 10 years

38

17.9

4.54

37

16.5

3.74

38

0.81

0.41

Perceived social status of family growing up

Bottom half

102

17.9

3.57

0.388

102

16.9

3.29

0.805

104

0.72

0.40

0.672

Upper half

46

18.5

3.69

46

16.8

2.85

46

0.69

0.48

Perceived social status of self now

Bottom half

57

17.8

3.77

0.448

58

16.6

3.23

0.340

59

0.67

0.44

0.387

Upper half

91

18.3

3.50

90

17.1

3.10

91

0.73

0.42

Social mobility

Upward mobility

101

17.9

3.51

0.154

100

16.9

3.17

0.808

102

0.73

0.43

0.126

No change

34

19.1

3.57

35

17.1

3.21

35

0.72

0.36

Downward mobility

13

17.2

4.16

13

16.4

3.04

13

0.48

0.57

Religion

Catholic

120

18.0

3.67

0.490

120

16.9

3.67

0.873

121

0.71

0.42

0.899

Methodist/Presby/Anglican

28

18.5

3.32

28

17.0

2.50

29

0.70

0.47

Training on interpersonal interactions

No

60

18.5

3.53

0.219

59

17.2

2.71

0.335

60

0.71

0.44

0.924

Yes

88

17.8

3.64

89

16.7

3.42

90

0.71

0.42

  1. Higher mean scores on the low SES vignette indicate stronger negative explicit bias towards the low SES woman, while higher mean scores on the high SES vignette indicate stronger negative explicit bias towards the high SES woman. Higher IAT scores indicate stronger bias in favor of high SES patients