From: Ethical considerations of the vaccine development process and vaccination: a scoping review
Specific groups | Codes | Semantic units |
---|---|---|
HCWs | 1- Prioritizing front-line HCWs due to their higher odds of contagion exposure [28, 30, 41, 43]. | • Giving priority to HCWs due to constant exposure • Respecting the right to have a safe work environment • The importance of the ability to care for and protect patients • Maintaining the stability and resilience of the health care system in emergencies |
2- Conflict of ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence with compulsory vaccination among HCWs [16, 21, 42]. | • Consideration of the conflict between the ethical principles of beneficence and autonomy with compulsory vaccination of health care workers | |
3- Concerns of HCWs about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines [21]. | • HCWs doubt the safety and effectiveness of vaccines • HCWs worry about the severity of the disease • HCWs have concerns about Covid-19 and vaccination like other people in society | |
4- The unwillingness of HCWs to be vaccinated despite their responsibility to implement the vaccination strategy and reassure the community [27, 42]. | • Responsibility of HCWs as the main element in implementing public vaccination strategies • HCWs’ responsibility to reassure the community • The reluctance of HCWs due to uncertainty about the safety of vaccines • The effect of race on vaccine hesitancy and primarily unequal access among HCWs | |
5- Prioritizing vaccination based on balancing profit and loss/ benefits and risks (balance of principles of beneficence and non-maleficence) [27, 42]. | • Consideration of maximizing vaccination benefits and minimizing risks to prioritize HCWs • Vaccination is more useful for HCWs because of the greater risk of infection • High risk of infection in HCWs due to their constant exposure | |
Children and adolescents | 1- Acquiring informed consent tailored to children and adolescents [9, 31]. | • Considering the ethical considerations of autonomy, informed consent, confidentiality, and protection of individuals for vaccination of children like other groups • Acquiring informed consent from children for vaccination like any other medical procedure |
2- Evaluation and acceleration of vaccine immunization trials vaccine in children and adolescents [20]. | • Accelerating immunogenicity trials of Covid-19 vaccine in children and adolescents due to lack of reliable, evidence-based information on their long-term effects | |
3- Consideration of the expected beneficence for the community and the child during the children and adolescents vaccination process [29]. | • Consideration of the expected beneficence for the community and the child during the children and adolescents vaccination process • Implementation of compulsory vaccination policies for children can be justified when it has the expected positive benefits for both society and children and adolescents. | |
4- Considering the ethical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and trust in the vaccination of children as well as adolescents [9, 31]. | • Impossibility of acquiring informed consent from the children without the parent’s permission • The negative impact of parental pressure to vaccinate children and adolescents on their autonomy and informed consent | |
5- Lack of ethical justification for the vaccination of children as a requirement to attend school [43]. | • Lack of evidence-based information on the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines for children • Vaccination requirement for children to attend school is not ethical | |
Elderly | • Giving priority to the elderly for injecting emergency licensed vaccines • Giving priority to the elderly with comorbidities | |
Ethnic and racial minorities | 1- Identifying the conditions and social harms of racial and ethnic minority communities to remove barriers to vaccination [24, 38]. | • Limited access of ethnic and racial minorities to health care and services due to social factors • Identifying the conditions and social harms of ethnic and racial minorities |
2- Considering institutional and structural discrimination as a factor leading to vaccine hesitancy among ethnic and racial groups [22, 24, 37, 38]. | • Suspicion, fear, and hesitancy about the pressure to be vaccinated among minorities • Racial injustices in vaccine development and trial • Minorities’ religious and moral concerns • Hesitancy about the legitimacy and restrictions on access to vaccine information • The rampancy of distrust and uncertainty among minorities due to previous institutional and structural discrimination | |
3- The necessity of reducing health inequalities in the distribution of vaccines [38]. | • Opportunity-oriented approach to the distribution of the Covid-19 vaccine as an opportunity to address the health inequalities of ethnic and racial minorities • The effect of the socio-economic status of ethnic and racial minorities on the fair distribution of vaccines • Coping with the unfair distribution of vaccines among minorities (removing barriers to equal distribution of vaccines among ethnic and racial minorities) |