Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary Statistics for Team Level Statements (n = 151) listed by Median, then by percentage ‘Unsure’

From: The research interest, capacity and culture of NHS staff in South East Scotland and changes in attitude to research following the pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

Qu

The Team:

Unsure %

n

Median

IQR

18

supports peer-reviewed publication of research

35.8

97

8

3–9

7

does planning that is guided by evidence

20.5

120

8

5–10

10

conducts research activities relevant to practice

19.9

121

8

5–10

5

has team leaders that support research

14.6

129

8

5–9

15

supports a multi-disciplinary approach to research

24.5

114

7.5

4.75–9

12

has mechanisms to monitor research quality

38.4

93

7

3–9

8

has consumer involvement in research activities/planning

33.1

101

7

3.5–9

17

has external partners (e.g. universities) engaged in research

31.1

104

7

3–9

13

has identified experts accessible for research advice

26.4

111

7

4–9

14

disseminates research results at research forums/seminars

30.4

105

6

4–9

1

has adequate resources to support staff research training

19.9

121

6

3–8

4

ensures staff involvement in team level planning for research development

19.9

121

6

3–8

6

provides opportunities to get involved in research

15.2

128

6

4–9

9

has applied for external funding for research

43.0

86

5

1.75–8.25

11

supports applications for research scholarships/ degrees

38.4

93

5

3–9

2

has funds, equipment or admin to support research activities

23.8

115

5

2–8

3

does team level planning for research development

19.2

122

5

2–8

19

has software available to support research activities

45.7

82

4

1–8

16

has incentives & support for mentoring activities

38.4

93

4

2–8