How to become an excellent pediatric resident: a qualitative comparative study from China

Table 2 Coding reliability test

Case ID	T₁	T₂	T₁ + T₂	S	CA	R
A01	12	14	26	10	0.77	0.87
A02	11	9	20	8	0.80	0.89
A03	12	13	25	10	0.80	0.89
A04	11	15	26	10	0.77	0.87
A05	14	12	26	11	0.85	0.92
A06	12	14	26	10	0.77	0.87
A07	13	11	24	10	0.83	0.91
A08	13	14	27	11	0.81	0.90
A09	9	10	19	7	0.74	0.85
A10	12	13	25	9	0.72	0.84
A11	13	14	27	11	0.81	0.90
A12	12	11	23	10	0.87	0.93
B01	12	10	22	9	0.82	0.90
B02	13	12	25	10	0.80	0.89
B03	13	11	24	9	0.75	0.86
B04	9	11	20	7	0.70	0.82
B05	14	12	26	11	0.85	0.92
B06	9	11	20	8	0.80	0.89
B07	14	12	26	11	0.85	0.92
B08	9	12	21	8	0.76	0.86
B09	13	11	24	10	0.83	0.91
B10	14	10	24	9	0.75	0.86
B11	12	11	23	9	0.78	0.88
All samples	276	273	549	218	0.79	0.88

A refers to general performance; B refers to excellent performance; T1 represents the number of codes of the first coder; T2 represents the number of codes of the second coder; S is the number of the same code; CA represents coding classification consistency; and R represents the coding reliability coefficient

ISSN: 1472-6963