Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the studies included in the review

From: Payment systems for dialysis and their effects: a scoping review

ID (year)

Country

Study subject

Study outcomes

Main results

Chang (2014) [23]

Taiwan

change from FFSa to ODBGb

outpatient visits, medication use, access to dialysis services, bundle of services doctors were providing

“Access to dialysis services” and the number of “dialysis visits” was not affected. The bundle of services provided to dialysis patients during their dialysis visit was changed.

The cost of antihypertensive drugs during the “dialysis visit” reduced, which increased “non-dialysis visits” with the prescription of antihypertensive drugs.

Trachtenberg (2020) [24]

Alberta (Canada)

increases in physician remuneration for PDc

PD use (90 days after dialysis initiation)

There was no statistical evidence of an increase in PD use.

Wang (2016) [25]

USA

the 2011 PPSd, and the FDA change in ESA labels

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hospitalized congestive heart failure (H-CHF), venous thromboembolism, transfusions

The risks of MACE and death did not change; the risk of stroke reduced, and the rate of transfusions increased.

Spoendlin (2018) [26]

USA

the 2011 PPS

IVe vitamin D use

totally implementation of PPS associated with reduction in IV vitamin D use

Hasegawa (2011) [27]

Japan

rHuEPO bundled reimbursement policy

Hgbf levels, rHuEPO use, IV iron use

This policy was associated with reduced rHuEPO doses, increased IV iron use, and stable Hgb levels.

Mentari (2005) [16]

USA

the 2004 reformg

Visits, HRQoLh, quality of care (Kt/Vi, albumin level, Hgb level, phosphorus level, calcium level, hemodialysis catheter use, ultrafiltration volume, shortened or skipped treatments, hospital admissions, hospitalization days)

Visits increased. There were no important changes in Kt/V, levels of albumin, Hgb, phosphorus, calcium, and HDj catheter use, ultrafiltration volume, shortened or skipped treatments, hospital admissions, hospitalization days, or HRQoL, including patient satisfaction.

Brunelli (2013) [28]

USA

the 2011 PPS

PD use, medication use, Hgb level, PTHk level, transfusion rates

Use of cinacalcet, phosphate binders, and oral vitamin D increased. IV vitamin D decreased. ESA use decreased. PTH levels increased. Hgb level decreased. PD increased. Transfusion increased.

Chang (2011) [29]

Taiwan

ODBG

outpatient/inpatient/emergency room utilization by the ESRD patients

outpatient utilization by the ESRD patients increased. No change in emergency room and inpatient utilization occurred.

Erickson (2016) [30]

USA

the 2004 reform

home dialysis

Home dialysis reduced, especially in larger dialysis facilities compared to smaller facilities.

Haarsager (2017) [31]

Queensland (Australia)

The Queensland’s incentive paymentsl

PD as first modality, AVF/AVGm rate at first HD

commencement of dialysis with PD or an AVF/AVG in 2011–12, when pay-for-performance applied, didn’t change. It improved in the subsequent 2 years, which may be due to a lag effect.

Erickson (2017) [32]

USA

the 2004 reform

hospitalizations, rehospitalizations

All-cause hospitalization or rehospitalization didn’t change, but slight reductions occurred in fluid overload hospitalization and rehospitalization.

Erickson (2014) [9]

USA

the 2004 reform

visit, mortality, transplant waiting list, costs

Dialysis visits and Medicare costs increased with no evidence of a benefit on survival or kidney transplant listing.

Zhang (2017) [33]

USA

the 2011 PPS

PD use

PD usage increased. Small dialysis organizations and nonprofit organizations appeared to increase use of PD faster compared to large dialysis organizations and for-profit units.

Hirth (2013) [12]

USA

the 2011 PPS

medication use, PD use, cost

Less expensive medications were substituted for more expensive types (e.g., vitamin D products, EPO use reduced, iron products increased). Drug spending overall decreased. PD usage increased.

Desai (2009) [34]

USA

the 2011 PPS

Perceived frequency and effect of cherry picking

Three-quarters of respondents reported that cherry picking occurred “sometimes” or “frequently.” All cherry-picking practices caused moderate to large effects on outcomes.

Wang (2018) [35]

USA

the 2011 PPS

facility provision of PD

PD provision increased.

Young (2019) [36]

USA

the 2011 PPS

discontinuation of PD, death

The risk of PD discontinuation fell. No adverse effect on mortality.

Sloan (2019) [37]

USA

the 2011 PPS

modality switches, PD use

PD usage increased. PD-to-HD switches decreased, HD-to-PD switches increased.

Norouzi (2020) [38]

USA

the 2011 PPS

dialysis facility closures

The PPS was not associated with increased closure of dialysis facilities.

Kleophas (2013) [39]

Germany

weekly flat rate payments and Quality Assurance (QA) system

four quality parameters (Treatment time, spKt/V, dialysis frequency, and Hgb)

Short treatment times (less than 4 h) and low Kt/V (below 1.2) reduced after implementation of QA. The frequency of prescribed HD sessions < 3 per week remained low. Hgb levels improved.

Spiegel (2010) [40]

USA

several recent eventsn

Hgb level

Hgb > 12 decreased and Hgb < 10 increased (mean Hgb level decreased), while target level is 10 < Hgb < 12

Monda (2015) [41]

USA

the 2011 PPS

ESA use, medication use, laboratory parameters, hospitalization events, and mortality

EPO use and mean Hgb level reduced.

Swaminathan (2015) [10]

USA

the 2011 PPS

ESA use

Use of ESAs reduced in patients who may not benefit from these agents.

Wetmore (2016) [42]

USA

the 2011 PPS

RBC transfusions, Medicare-incurred costs, sites of anemia management

transfusion increased. Site of care for transfusions have shifted to emergency departments or during observation stays. EPO dose declined. IV iron use decreased. a partial shift occurred in the cost and site of care for anemia management from dialysis facilities to hospitals

Fuller (2016) [11]

USA

the 2011 PPS

ESA use, IV iron use, Hgb level

From 2010 to 2013, substantial declines in ESA use and Hgb levels occurred in the United States but not in other DOPPS countries. Iv iron doses in the United States remained fairly stable.

Pirkle (2014) [43]

USA

the 2011 PPS

Hgb level, compliance

Hgb levels were stable over the 5 quarters of the study. Patient compliance with attendance for all scheduled home training unit visits was 84% (high).

Lin (2017) [44]

USA

the 2011 PPS

home dialysis use

Home dialysis increased, in both Medicare and non-Medicare patients. The training add-on did not associate with increases in home dialysis use.

McFarlane (2010) [45]

12 DOPPS countrieso

ESA and Hgb trends before 2007 CMS policy

Hgb level, ESA use

ESA usage rose except in Belgium. Hgb levels increased except in Sweden. These trends are independent of the reimbursement. But in the United States financial incentives increased use of these agents.

Thamer (2015) [46]

USA

the 2011 PPS

EPO use, hematocrit level

EPO usage, dosing and achieved hematocrit levels were declined after PPS.

Mendelssohn (2004) [47]

Ontario (Canada)

the capitation fee in 1998

dialysis modality rates

PD use continued to decline for 2 years, and then began to increase.

Hornberger (2012) [48]

USA

the 2011 PPS

modality choice

It caused increased use of PD but continued to discourage use of home HD.

Pisoni (2014) [49]

USA

the 2011 PPS

vascular access use

AVF use increased, while catheter use declined (from 2010 to 2013)

Tentori (2014) [50]

USA

the 2011 PPS and recent guidelines

1-serum PTH, total calcium, and phosphorus levels; 2-mineral and bone disorder (MBD) related treatments, including IV and oral vitamin D analogues, cinacalcet, and phosphate binders

Upper limits of targets for PTH and calcium levels increased, while phosphorus targets remained unchanged. No changes were in IV vitamin D or cinacalcet prescription. Many facilities switched IV vitamin D preparation from paricalcitol to Doxercalciferol during this period. Phosphate binder use increased.

Park (2015) [51]

USA

integration of Part D renal medications into the bundle

Oral phosphate binder medication budget impact

The phosphate binder costs increased.

Pisoni (2012) [52]

USA

from August 2010 to August 2011

EPO use, Hgb levels, IV iron use, serum ferritin and PTH levels

epoetin dose and Hgb levels declined. IV iron use, serum ferritin levels, and PTH levels increased.

Vanholder (2012) [53]

Seven countriesp

dialysis reimbursement in 7 countries

NA

Bundle of services and incentive programs in dialysis payment system of each country were explained.

Ponce (2012) [54]

Portugal

Portuguese dialysis reimbursement

NA

transitioning from a FFS reimbursement to a capitation system with quality indicators (P4P)

Maddux (2012) [55]

USA

the 2011 PPS (first year)

patient care

The impact on clinical care and patients is substantial.

Robinson (2013) [56]

USA

the 2011 PPS, the DOPPS practice monitor

NA

the DOPPS practice monitor provides timely representative data to monitor effects of the expanded PPS on dialysis practice.

Golper (2011) [57]

USA

the 2011 PPS

Home dialysis

It may encourage home dialysis.

Wish (2009) [58]

USA

the 2011 PPS

EPO use, IV iron use, Hgb level

The reform’s relevance to anemia management is indisputable.

Naito (2006) [59]

Japan

Japanese dialysis reimbursement

Modality selection

HD replaced by more efficient treatment options.

Swaminathan (2012) [60]

USA

The U.S. dialysis reimbursement changes until 2011

Cost

It is uncertain whether bundled payments can stem the increase in the total cost of dialysis.

Rivara (2015) [61]

USA

The U.S. recent dialysis payment reforms

Home dialysis use (PD and HHD)

The utilization of PD increased. Utilization of HHD has also grown, but the contribution of the expanded PPS to this growth is less certain.

Fuller (2013) [62]

USA

the 2011 PPS

Anemia Management

Overall, changes in anemia management were substantial in 2011 but relatively stable by mid to late 2012.

Piccoli (2019) [63]

NA

Dialysis Reimbursement models

Clinical choices

Each reimbursement model leads to especial outcomes.

Dor (2007) [15]

12 DOPPS countries

dialysis reimbursement systems

NA

comparative review of 12 countries shows alternative models of incentives and benefits.

Durand-Zaleski (2007) [64]

France

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: global in public hospital, FFS in private hospital (it is moving toward activity-based reimbursement)

/pay for nephrologist: Salary (in public hospitals), FFS (in private clinics)

Pontoriero (2007) [65]

Italy

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: FFS (bundled fee), pay for nephrologist: salary

Nicholson (2007) [66]

England and Wales

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: global budget through prospective payments (service level agreements) or fee for service (per outpatient HD treatment), pay for nephrologist: FFS, salary

Luño (2007) [67]

Spain

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: FFS (bundled fee), pay for nephrologist: salary

Fukuhara (2007) [68]

Japan

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: FFS (bundled fee), pay for nephrologist: salary

Kleophas (2007) [69]

Germany

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: capitation, FFS (for individual providers), pay for nephrologist: FFS

Wikström (2007) [70]

Sweden

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: global budget, pay for nephrologist: salary

Ashton (2007) [71]

New Zealand

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: global budget, pay for nephrologist: salary

Manns (2007) [72]

Canada

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: global budget, pay for nephrologist: FFS

Hirth (2007) [73]

United States of America

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: capitation, pay for nephrologist: capitation, FFS (for separately billable services)

Van-Biesen (2007) [17]

Belgium

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: capitation, pay for nephrologist: FFS

Harris (2007) [74]

Australia

Dialysis Reimbursement

NA

pay for medical center: currently global annual budget (they are going to a move toward capitation payment for fixed costs and a case payment for variable costs (per dialysis episode)), pay for nephrologist: FFS

  1. a Fee for service
  2. b Outpatient dialysis global budget (ODGB) payment
  3. c Peritoneal dialysis
  4. d The 2011 Prospective Payment System (PPS) reform. It introduced some core services as the expanded bundle, and case-mixed indicators for payment adjustments
  5. e Intravenous
  6. f Hemoglobin
  7. g A reform in physician payment for in-center HD care from a capitated to a tiered fee-for-service approach, in which nephrologists are paid more for each additional face-to-face visit up to 4 visits per month
  8. h Health related quality of life
  9. i A number to quantify dialysis adequacy
  10. j Hemodialysis
  11. k Parathyroid hormone
  12. l In 2011–12, Queensland Health made incentive payments to renal units for early referred patients who commenced PD, or HD with an AVF/AVG.
  13. m arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/ arteriovenous graft (AVG)
  14. n including new clinical study results, ESA product label revisions, and coverage and reimbursement policy changes
  15. o The U.S., France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, Australia, Belgium, Canada, New Zealand, and Sweden
  16. p the U.S., Ontario, and five European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom