Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors that best classify health practitioners with good and poor personal wellbeing

From: Pattern and perception of wellbeing, quality of work life and quality of care of health professionals in Southwest Nigeria

Predictors

Regression Coefficients (B)

Odds ratio (β)

Wald

P-value

Age (years)

 20 – 29 (reference)

  

13.869

0.008*

 30 – 39

-0.242

0.785

2.277

0.131

 40 – 49

0.028

1.028

0.025

0.876

 50 – 59

0.433

1.542

4.367

0.037*

 60 – 69

0.221

1.247

0.048

0.826

Gender (reference = female)

 Male

-0.446

0.640

12.768

 < 0.001*

Quality of Work Life

1.101

3.007

79.627

 < 0.001*

Clinician Quality of Care

0.427

1.533

12.302

 < 0.001*

WHO-Quality of Life

1.218

3.380

104.708

0.007*

Constant

-1.146

0.318

56.099

 < 0.001*

  1. Approach: Forward Wald binary logistic regression
  2. Model summary: χ2 (8, N = 1580) = 326.725, p < 0.001. Nagelkerke R2 = 26.5%. Overall prediction success was also modest at 69.6%, with 62.5% of people with good personal wellbeing correctly classified and 75.5% of people classified under poor personal wellbeing
  3. * = statistic is significant at p < 0.05