Table 5 Ideas on what novelties should be incorporated into the Results Centre to stimulate quality improvement

New channels and formats for message dissemination

18

3

15

–

4.1 (3)

4 (0.2)

–

Information grouped at the territorial level and according to each area of influence

14

–

2

12

–

4.4 (0.2)

4.6 (0.1)

Greater social dissemination among the population and professionals

12

11

1

–

4.0 (0.2)

3.9 (0.3)

–

Reports focused on continuous improvement and benchmarking

12

4

5

3

4.8 (0.1)

4.5 (0.1)

4.7 (0.1)

Regular and more up-to-date information

11

3

4

4

4.0 (0.3)

4.3 (0.2)

4.0 (0.2)

Indicators of health outcomes and person-centred care (quality of life, PREM, PROM, etc.)

7

1

5

1

3.9 (0.2)

4.0 (0.2)

2.6 (0.5)

Contextualised information according to patient profile for comparison purposes

6

1

3

2

4.7 (0.1)

4.0 (0.2)

3.1 (0.4)

Results that add value and were shared by the professionals involved

6

2

1

3

4.1 (0.1)

4.2 (0.2)

4.0 (0.3)

Actionable information for the management of practitioners

5

4

1

–

3.7 (0,3)

3.2 (0,4)

–

Standardisation of the construction of indicators

5

4

1

–

4.0 (0,2)

4.2 (0.2)

–

Information aligned with the objectives

2

–

1

1

–

3.9 (0.3)

2.1 (0.3)