Skip to main content

Table 4 Benefits and problems of GS and RPS as reported by the dispensers

From: Factors facilitating and hindering counselling about generic substitution and a reference price system in community pharmacies - a survey among Finnish dispensers

Benefits

Respondents

(n = 476)a

n (%)

Cost savings for customers and society

354 (74.4)

Lower medicine prices and price competition

106 (22.3)

Improved availability in medicine shortages

92 (19.3)

Customer has the right to decide on GS and the freedom to choose the product

65 (13.7)

Improved medication adherence by choosing the most suitable preparation for the customerb and due to a lower medicine price

33 (6.9)

No need to contact the physician about GS

25 (5.3)

Several optional interchangeable medicines

13 (2.7)

Otherc

36 (7.6)

Problems

Respondents

(n = 467)a

n(%)

Medicine availability problems

149 (31.9)

Changes in medicine prices and reference price band

135 (28.9)

GS takes time and increases the workload (e.g. price counselling, explaining the system to customers, checking the availability of interchangeable products)

113 (24.2)

Inventory control is challenging (e.g. not everything or even the cheapest can be kept in stock, difficulty in storage due to the unpredictability of preparations within reference price bands)

101 (21.6)

Change of the preparation due to GS may pose a risk to medication safety (e.g. changes in name, packaging or appearance confuse customers, double medication, complications in keeping up to date with medicines in use)

100 (21.4)

The system is complex for the customer to understand

72 (15.4)

Actions by pharmaceutical companies (e.g. setting really low prices for a small batch of medicines)

54 (11.6)

Customers’ suspicious or negative attitude towards GS

42 (9.0)

Obligation to inform the customer about the cheapest product is frustrating (e.g. because of small price differences between products)

33 (7.1)

Differences between interchangeable preparations (e.g. experienced efficacy, side effects, whether or not tablets can be split)

30 (6.4)

Information systems problems (e.g. do not provide enough information about availability)

19 (4.1)

Too many interchangeable medicines options

18 (3.9)

Otherd

68 (14.6)

  1. aRespondents could list several factors; be.g. in terms of excipients, whether or not tablets can be split, packaging; ce.g. no need to have every interchangeable preparation in stock in the pharmacy, customer satisfaction; dLower profitability and margins for pharmacies, contraceptive pills are not interchangeable. There may be a large cost to the customer if substitution is declined