Table 1 Planned and actual districts and facilities audited by province
From: Undernotification and underreporting of tuberculosis in Zambia: a national data quality assessment
Province | Planned Coverage | Actual Coverage | Proportion of planned coverage (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Districts | Facilities | Districts | Facilities | Districts | Facilities | ||
Central | 8 | 26 | 2 | 19 | 25% | 73% | |
Copperbelt | 9 | 138 | 8 | 87 | 89% | 63% | |
Eastern | 5 | 33 | 7 | 10 | 140% | 30% | |
Luapula | 5 | 17 | 4 | 12 | 80% | 71% | |
Lusaka | 5 | 45 | 5 | 52 | 100% | 116% | |
Muchinga | 4 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 100% | 82% | |
Northern | 6 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 83% | 76% | |
North-Western | 5 | 16 | 10 | 25 | 200% | 156% | |
Southern | 8 | 39 | 5 | 19 | 63% | 49% | |
Western | 6 | 38 | 5 | 19 | 83% | 50% | |
Overall | 60 | 380 | 55 | 265 | 92% | 70% | |