Skip to main content

Table 2 Relationships between sample characteristics and frequency of working with alcohol-related cases

From: Do health professionals’ attitudes towards alcohol use matter for alcohol prevention efforts? Results from the WIRUS-OHS study

Characteristics

Unadjusted

Adjusted

Ba (95% CI)b

βc

p-value

Ba (95% CI)b

βc

p-value

One-year increase in age

0.04 (0.02–0.05)

0.24

 < 0.001

0.02 (-0.00–0.04)

0.12

0.07

Female gender

-0.04 (-0.47–0.39)

-0.01

0.85

-

-

-

One-year increase in OHS experience

0.03 (0.01–0.05)

0.19

0.001

0.01 (-0.01–0.03)

0.06

0.35

Professional groupd

1.41 (1.09–1.72)

0.44

 < 0.001

1.46 (0.36–2.56)

0.46

0.01

One-point increase in DNS score

-0.15 (-0.59–0.29)

-0.04

0.51

-

-

-

DNS × professional group

0.67 (0.51–0.83)

0.41

 < 0.001

-0.08 (-0.64–0.47)

-0.05

0.77

DNS × size of work unit

-0.09 (-0.27–0.10)

-0.05

0.36

-

-

-

DNS × location of work unit

-0.00 (-0.07–0.06)

-0.01

0.91

-

-

-

Explained variance (R2)

    

21.7%

 < 0.001

  1. a Beta coefficient from linear regression
  2. b 95% confidence intervals
  3. c standardized beta coefficient
  4. d the reference category includes occupational therapist, occupational hygienist, nutritionist, physiotherapist, and ‘other’, while the second category includes physician, psychologist, and nurse