Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression analyses – relationships between organizational arrangements and innovativeness and efficiency

From: Organizational arrangements as a key to enhancing innovativeness and efficiency – analysis of a restructuring hospital in Finland

Variables Innovativeness Efficiency
  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
1. Age .005(.040) -.020(.038) -.039(.031) -.057(.028)*
2. Gender .287(.099)** .185(.095)a .160(.077)* .069(.071)
3. Experience .006(.005) .009(.005)a .001(.004) .002(.004)
4. Resources -.014(.061) -.131(.071)a .094(.047)* -.135(.053)*
5. Performance-focused   .411(.075)**   .275(.056)**
6. Hierarchy-focused   .135(.083)b   .119(.061)*
7. Tradition-focused   -.201(.094)*   -.111(.070)
8. Leader-focused   .103(.084)   .064(.062)
9. Collaborative   .120(.081)   .232(.061)**
10. Fragmented   -.080(.077)   -.162(.057)**
11. Unit incl incl incl incl
F 2.810* 7.715** 2.295a 12.207**
R2 .025 .153 .021 .222
R2 Adj .016 .133 .012 .204
  1. Std. errors in parenthesis;
  2. *p < .05; **p < .01, ap < .10; (bp = .103)