Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression analyses – relationships between organizational arrangements and innovativeness and efficiency

From: Organizational arrangements as a key to enhancing innovativeness and efficiency – analysis of a restructuring hospital in Finland

Variables

Innovativeness

Efficiency

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

1. Age

.005(.040)

-.020(.038)

-.039(.031)

-.057(.028)*

2. Gender

.287(.099)**

.185(.095)a

.160(.077)*

.069(.071)

3. Experience

.006(.005)

.009(.005)a

.001(.004)

.002(.004)

4. Resources

-.014(.061)

-.131(.071)a

.094(.047)*

-.135(.053)*

5. Performance-focused

 

.411(.075)**

 

.275(.056)**

6. Hierarchy-focused

 

.135(.083)b

 

.119(.061)*

7. Tradition-focused

 

-.201(.094)*

 

-.111(.070)

8. Leader-focused

 

.103(.084)

 

.064(.062)

9. Collaborative

 

.120(.081)

 

.232(.061)**

10. Fragmented

 

-.080(.077)

 

-.162(.057)**

11. Unit

incl

incl

incl

incl

F

2.810*

7.715**

2.295a

12.207**

R2

.025

.153

.021

.222

R2 Adj

.016

.133

.012

.204

  1. Std. errors in parenthesis;
  2. *p < .05; **p < .01, ap < .10; (bp = .103)